Spread Peace

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Guardianship is essential for the continuity of the Baha’i Faith

Dear Kevin,

I have gone through your questions and reply of Hand of Cause Nosrat ullah Bahremand and your comment on the reply of Mr. Nosrat.
I am writing to you, assuming that you are a Baha'i and a follower of majority group UHJ.
First of all I would like to write you that the reply by Mr. Nosrat is to the point and correct. Here I would like to clarify that the Universal House of Justice in Haifa without its head (Guardian) is Bogus.
As for the self-proclaimed, uncertified and power hungry guardians who are hiding behind the veils, attacking anonymously and sowing seed of infidelity and discontent, I also believe that it will serve no purpose. But I want to ask you whether the guardian in Baha’i Faith is essential or not?
I hope that as I assumed that you are a Bahai, you will investigate the matter of continuity of guardianship in the writings of Baha u llah, Abdu’l Baha and Shoghi Effendi. And if you are not a Bahai, you can comment anything.
And as for your comment that “The Orthodox Baha'i Faith and disputed guardianship castle is built on sand. How long will it stand....We will watch”, I feel that as the guardianship is an essential factor for the continuity of the Baha’i Faith, for power hungry people, it is good opportunity to proclaim for “False and bogus guardianship.” This is the testing time for the believers thus the duty of the believers is to follow the true guardian.
At the end, I request to you all the readers of our blog that if you are Baha'i, please adorn yourself with the moral and teachings of Baha u llah. I have seen lot of comments in blog which shows that commentators are Baha'is but their manner is not a “Baha'i Manner”

Dr. A. Parikh,
Secretary, PNBC of India.


Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Parikh.

I think it is useless to request the followers of illegitimate UHJ to adorn with the morals. They are selfish people. They talk about universal peace, equality etc but they do not practice it.

They don't believe in the Will and Testament of Abdu'l Baha. They are cheating in India to the Government of India. They are cheating to UNO. Then how do you request them for moral and good behavior.

Kevin said...

You are wrong my dear anonymous. Don't utter a word against us without any evidence. Give the proof of your accusation. I know you do not have it. Your approach reflects that how desperate you people are?

Anonymous said...

Mr. Kevin,

What kind of proof you need? Do you want the proof that UHJ is bogus?

Please note that when guardian is not there in UHJ, it is bogus. You read the Weill and Tstament of Abdu'l Baha, you will find that without the guardian UHJ can not function.

As for cheating to Govt. of India,do you not know the newspaper reports of espionage by bahais in India or do you not know the forgery of Iranian Bahai of India in connection to his passport, ration card. Do you not know the case of FERA by the officials of Bahais in New Delhi.

I hope that you will now enquire about the cheatings anf fraud by the Bahais of India.

At the end I suggest you to read the Will and Testament to confirm that present UHJ is bogus and find that who is wrong and who is right.

Anonymous said...

“Has the Guardian interpreted verse 42 of the Aqdas? If so I would like to know his interpretation.”

If you mean the Verse regarding the “Endowments dedicated to charity” the answer is no, none of the Guardians have interpreted that Verse. If it was necessary they would have done it.
Unfortunately bogus UHJ has illegitimately and erroneously altered and interpreted this passage of Aqdas disregarding the following warning of Baha’u’llah in The most Holy Book and by doing so has transgressed against the Aqdas, violated this most Holy Book and has confused majority of the Baha’is.

“Whoso interpreteth what hath been sent down from the heaven of Revelation, and altereth its evident meaning, he, verily, is of them that have perverted the Sublime Word of God, and is of the lost ones in the Lucid Book.”
(The Kitab-i-Aqdas, p. 57)

For further information please read the following article:


And the following article specially parts 3&4: